Manual: Added some topics the the FAQ section.

This commit is contained in:
LoRd_MuldeR 2014-12-28 21:51:19 +01:00
parent a1ebfb3226
commit de911258ec
2 changed files with 137 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -75,7 +75,13 @@
<li><a href="#build-prerequisites"><span class="toc-section-number">7.2</span> Build Prerequisites</a></li>
<li><a href="#qt-as-static-libraries"><span class="toc-section-number">7.3</span> Qt as Static Libraries</a></li>
</ul></li>
<li><a href="#f.a.q.-frequently-asked-questions"><span class="toc-section-number">8</span> F.A.Q. (Frequently Asked Questions)</a></li>
<li><a href="#f.a.q.-frequently-asked-questions"><span class="toc-section-number">8</span> F.A.Q. (Frequently Asked Questions)</a><ul>
<li><a href="#q-do-i-have-to-pay-for-using-or-obtaining-lamexp"><span class="toc-section-number">8.1</span> Q: Do I have to pay for using or obtaining LameXP?</a></li>
<li><a href="#q-can-i-redistribute-the-lamexp-software"><span class="toc-section-number">8.2</span> Q: Can I redistribute the LameXP software?</a></li>
<li><a href="#q-how-can-i-donate-to-the-authors-of-lamexp"><span class="toc-section-number">8.3</span> Q: How can I donate to the authors of LameXP?</a></li>
<li><a href="#q-why-is-this-software-called-lamexp"><span class="toc-section-number">8.4</span> Q: Why is this software called <em>LameXP</em>?</a></li>
<li><a href="#q-why-are-the-lamexp-binaries-not-digitally-signed"><span class="toc-section-number">8.5</span> Q: Why are the LameXP binaries <em>not</em> digitally signed?</a></li>
</ul></li>
</ul>
</nav>
<h1 id="introduction"><span class="header-section-number">1</span> Introduction</h1>
@ -437,7 +443,61 @@ Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA.<
</ol>
<p> <br /><em>Note:</em> Static libraries only work with the exactly same compiler (version) they were built with!</p>
<h1 id="f.a.q.-frequently-asked-questions"><span class="header-section-number">8</span> F.A.Q. (Frequently Asked Questions)</h1>
<p><strong>TODO</strong></p>
<p>This section tries to answer some of the most frequently asked questions. So if you have a question, please have a look at this section, before you send the question to us 😉</p>
<h2 id="q-do-i-have-to-pay-for-using-or-obtaining-lamexp"><span class="header-section-number">8.1</span> Q: Do I have to pay for using or obtaining LameXP?</h2>
<p><strong>A:</strong> Nope. LameXP is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software">free software</a>. You may use it free of charge and for any purpose, including commercial purposes, according to the terms of the <a href="GNU%20General%20Public%20License"><em>GNU General Public License</em></a>. The developers of LameXP will <strong>never</strong> ask you to pay for using the LameXP software. Also, several <em>free</em> download mirrors are provided. However, it was brought to our attention, that there are some <em>third-party</em> web-sites which offer <em>payed</em> downloads of LameXP, or provide LameXP downloads that have been infected with Adware we do <strong>not</strong> cooperate with any of these web-sites! Therefore, please do <strong>not</strong> pay money for using or obtaining the LameXP software; the developers of LameXP will <strong>not</strong> benefit from this money. If anybody tries to make you pay money for for using or obtaining the LameXP software, this is <em>fraud</em> and you should <strong>not</strong> respond to this kind of offer!</p>
<h2 id="q-can-i-redistribute-the-lamexp-software"><span class="header-section-number">8.2</span> Q: Can I redistribute the LameXP software?</h2>
<p><strong>A:</strong> Yes. LameXP is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software">free software</a>. You may modify and/or redistribute it freely, according to the terms of the <a href="GNU%20General%20Public%20License"><em>GNU General Public License</em></a>. However, be aware that it is <em>strictly forbidden</em> to bundle the LameXP program files and/or the LameXP installation program with any kind of Adware, Spyware or PUP (potentially unwanted program). Usually, <em>no</em> additional permission will be needed. If, however, you wish to redistribute the LameXP software in a way that does <strong>not</strong> <em>comply</em> with the license terms, a written permission by the author of the LameXP software is required!</p>
<h2 id="q-how-can-i-donate-to-the-authors-of-lamexp"><span class="header-section-number">8.3</span> Q: How can I donate to the authors of LameXP?</h2>
<p><strong>A:</strong> At this time, the authors of the LameXP software do <strong>not</strong> accept any donations, in terms of money. If you wish to support the LameXP project, then you may do so by contributing translations, by improving the LameXP program code or by providing web-server capacity.</p>
<h2 id="q-why-is-this-software-called-lamexp"><span class="header-section-number">8.4</span> Q: Why is this software called <em>LameXP</em>?</h2>
<p><strong>A:</strong> Originally, the LameXP software was created as a very simple <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphical_user_interface">GUI front-end</a> to the <a href="http://lame.sourceforge.net/"><em>LAME</em></a> MP3 command-line encoder. The original version of this software, released some time in 2004, did <strong>not</strong> support any encoders except for LAME, it did <strong>not</strong> support any input formats except for Wave Audio, it did <strong>not</strong> support any audio filters, it did <strong>not</strong> support multi-threading, it did <strong>not</strong> support Unicode file names and it did <strong>not</strong> handle meta information. Because the software was a front-end to LAME, because it was running on the Microsoft Windows operating system and because, back at that time, <em>Windows XP</em> was the most popular Windows version (by far), I decided to call the software &quot;LAME front-end for Windows XP&quot; or, in short, <em>LameXP</em>. Note the most creative name, I have to admit. Anyway, more and more features have been added to the LameXP software over the years. Also, the software has been re-written from the scratch at least two times. Nonetheless, the original name of the software has been retained. This is partly because people have become used to that name, and partly because I simply haven't been able to come up with a better name…</p>
<h2 id="q-why-are-the-lamexp-binaries-not-digitally-signed"><span class="header-section-number">8.5</span> Q: Why are the LameXP binaries <em>not</em> digitally signed?</h2>
<p><strong>A:</strong> They <em>are</em>! The official LameXP binaries <em>are</em> digitally signed, by <a href="http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy"><em>PGP</em></a> signatures, using the <a href="">GnuPG</a><a href="http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Privacy_Guard">http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Privacy_Guard</a> software. However, the LameXP binaries are <em>not</em> signed in a way that the Microsoft Windows operating system recognizes. Note that Microsoft Windows does <strong>not</strong> recognize PGP/GnuPG signatures. For this reason, Microsoft Windows may show a warning when trying to launch or install the LameXP software. Microsoft Windows will also complain that the LameXP software originates from an &quot;unknown publisher&quot;.</p>
<p>So why are the LameXP binaries not signed in the way Microsoft Windows recognizes? This is because Microsoft Windows uses a <em>hierarchical</em> trust model: Windows trusts into a number of <em>Certificate Authorities</em> (CA), which are built into the operating system. These CA's can issue signing certificates, e.g., to software companies. The software company can then use its signing certificate to sign their binaries. Finally, Windows will verify the signature by using the corresponding signing certificate. And the signing certificate is verified using the <em>built-in</em> CA certificate. However, this system is <em>flawed</em>: First of all, CA's do <em>not</em> create signing certificates for free. Also these certificates are only valid for a limited period of time. LameXP is a <em>non-profit</em> project and therefore we can <em>not</em> afford buying new certificates in regular intervals. Secondly, and even more important, the whole system depends on the <em>trustworthiness of the CA's</em>. But, as we all (should) know by now, these CA's can be forced to create &quot;bogus&quot; certificates, e.g. by intelligence services or other governmental organizations. Please also see <a href="http://blog.fefe.de/?ts=b25933c5"><strong>this</strong></a> blog post by &quot;fefe&quot; for an in-depth explanation.</p>
<p>If you want to verify the LameXP signatures yourself, then you may do so by using the <a href="http://www.gpg4win.de/">Gpg4win</a> software package, an easy-to-use distribution of the <em>GnuPG</em> software for Microsoft Windows. Of course you will also require the <em>public</em> key of the LameXP developers. The <em>finperprint</em> of the official GnuPG signing key is <code>3265784425BF2B394F67CE07106A413D6CF3FA22</code> and the corresponding public key block is provided in the following. If you are <em>not</em> familiar with the GnuPG software yet, please have a look at the <a href="http://www.gpg4win.de/documentation.html">Gpg4win compendium</a> or the <a href="https://www.gnupg.org/documentation/manuals.html">GnuPG manual</a>.</p>
<p><strong>LameXP public GnuPG key:</strong></p>
<pre><code>-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (MingW32)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=WDwE
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----</code></pre>
<p> <br /> <br /><strong>EOF</strong></p>
</body>
</html>

View File

@ -622,7 +622,81 @@ In order to create a "fully static" build of LameXP, i.e. a build that does *not
# F.A.Q. (Frequently Asked Questions) #
**TODO**
This section tries to answer some of the most frequently asked questions. So if you have a question, please have a look at this section, before you send the question to us &#x1f609;
## Q: Do I have to pay for using or obtaining LameXP? ##
**A:** Nope. LameXP is [free software](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software). You may use it free of charge and for any purpose, including commercial purposes, according to the terms of the [*GNU General Public License*](GNU General Public License). The developers of LameXP will **never** ask you to pay for using the LameXP software. Also, several *free* download mirrors are provided. However, it was brought to our attention, that there are some *third-party* web-sites which offer *payed* downloads of LameXP, or provide LameXP downloads that have been infected with Adware &ndash; we do **not** cooperate with any of these web-sites! Therefore, please do **not** pay money for using or obtaining the LameXP software; the developers of LameXP will **not** benefit from this money. If anybody tries to make you pay money for for using or obtaining the LameXP software, this is *fraud* and you should **not** respond to this kind of offer!
## Q: Can I redistribute the LameXP software? ##
**A:** Yes. LameXP is [free software](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software). You may modify and/or redistribute it freely, according to the terms of the [*GNU General Public License*](GNU General Public License). However, be aware that it is *strictly forbidden* to bundle the LameXP program files and/or the LameXP installation program with any kind of Adware, Spyware or PUP (potentially unwanted program). Usually, *no* additional permission will be needed. If, however, you wish to redistribute the LameXP software in a way that does **not** *comply* with the license terms, a written permission by the author of the LameXP software is required!
## Q: How can I donate to the authors of LameXP? ##
**A:** At this time, the authors of the LameXP software do **not** accept any donations, in terms of money. If you wish to support the LameXP project, then you may do so by contributing translations, by improving the LameXP program code or by providing web-server capacity.
## Q: Why is this software called *LameXP*? ##
**A:** Originally, the LameXP software was created as a very simple [GUI front-end](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphical_user_interface) to the [*LAME*](http://lame.sourceforge.net/) MP3 command-line encoder. The original version of this software, released some time in 2004, did **not** support any encoders except for LAME, it did **not** support any input formats except for Wave Audio, it did **not** support any audio filters, it did **not** support multi-threading, it did **not** support Unicode file names and it did **not** handle meta information. Because the software was a front-end to LAME, because it was running on the Microsoft Windows operating system and because, back at that time, *Windows XP* was the most popular Windows version (by far), I decided to call the software "LAME front-end for Windows XP" &ndash; or, in short, *LameXP*. Note the most creative name, I have to admit. Anyway, more and more features have been added to the LameXP software over the years. Also, the software has been re-written from the scratch at least two times. Nonetheless, the original name of the software has been retained. This is partly because people have become used to that name, and partly because I simply haven't been able to come up with a better name&hellip;
## Q: Why are the LameXP binaries *not* digitally signed? ##
**A:** They *are*! The official LameXP binaries *are* digitally signed, by [*PGP*](http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy) signatures, using the [GnuPG]()http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Privacy_Guard software. However, the LameXP binaries are *not* signed in a way that the Microsoft Windows operating system recognizes. Note that Microsoft Windows does **not** recognize PGP/GnuPG signatures. For this reason, Microsoft Windows may show a warning when trying to launch or install the LameXP software. Microsoft Windows will also complain that the LameXP software originates from an "unknown publisher".
So why are the LameXP binaries not signed in the way Microsoft Windows recognizes? This is because Microsoft Windows uses a *hierarchical* trust model: Windows trusts into a number of *Certificate Authorities* (CA), which are built into the operating system. These CA's can issue signing certificates, e.g., to software companies. The software company can then use its signing certificate to sign their binaries. Finally, Windows will verify the signature by using the corresponding signing certificate. And the signing certificate is verified using the *built-in* CA certificate. However, this system is *flawed*: First of all, CA's do *not* create signing certificates for free. Also these certificates are only valid for a limited period of time. LameXP is a *non-profit* project and therefore we can *not* afford buying new certificates in regular intervals. Secondly, and even more important, the whole system depends on the *trustworthiness of the CA's*. But, as we all (should) know by now, these CA's can be forced to create "bogus" certificates, e.g. by intelligence services or other governmental organizations. Please also see [**this**](http://blog.fefe.de/?ts=b25933c5) blog post by "fefe" for an in-depth explanation.
If you want to verify the LameXP signatures yourself, then you may do so by using the [Gpg4win](http://www.gpg4win.de/) software package, an easy-to-use distribution of the *GnuPG* software for Microsoft Windows. Of course you will also require the *public* key of the LameXP developers. The *finperprint* of the official GnuPG signing key is ``3265784425BF2B394F67CE07106A413D6CF3FA22`` and the corresponding public key block is provided in the following. If you are *not* familiar with the GnuPG software yet, please have a look at the [Gpg4win compendium](http://www.gpg4win.de/documentation.html) or the [GnuPG manual](https://www.gnupg.org/documentation/manuals.html).
**LameXP public GnuPG key:**
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (MingW32)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=WDwE
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----